<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>2009, July (Vol. 3, No. 2)</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2132" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2132</id>
<updated>2026-04-18T16:17:05Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-18T16:17:05Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>STUDIES ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LOW COST SOLAR TUNNEL DRIER OVER TRADITIONAL SUN DRYING OF PRAWN, Macrobrachium lamarrei IN THE LABORATORY</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2167" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fatema, K.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ahmed, A. T. A.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Khaleque, M. A.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Begum, M.</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2167</id>
<updated>2019-01-15T07:41:31Z</updated>
<published>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">STUDIES ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LOW COST SOLAR TUNNEL DRIER OVER TRADITIONAL SUN DRYING OF PRAWN, Macrobrachium lamarrei IN THE LABORATORY
Fatema, K.; Ahmed, A. T. A.; Khaleque, M. A.; Begum, M.
Laboratory experiment was carried out to compare the effectiveness of the new Low Cost Solar Tunnel&#13;
Drying (LCSTD) technique with the Traditional Sun Drying (TSD) method of the Prawn, Macrobruchium&#13;
lumarrci. [loth salted and unsalted Prawn (M. lamarrei) required 4 hours for drying in LCSTD, while in&#13;
sun drying it required 6 hours, During the experimental period the inside drying temperature and percentage&#13;
of relative humidity varied from 4:1 to solie and 35 to 50%, respectively, whereas outside drying&#13;
temperature and percentage of relative humidity varied from 29 to .'8"C and 50 to 78%. respectively. Solar&#13;
tunnel dried unsalted sample contained on an average of 14.65% moisture, 61.58% protein. :1.4'7" fat and&#13;
17.23% ash whereas sun dried unsalted sample contained 20.5')1. moisture, 5~% protein. 3.1'if, fat and&#13;
15.5% ash.The rate of drying was greater in the Low Cost Solar Tunnel Drier (LCSTD), which effectively&#13;
controlled the fly larva infestation during drying. The low cost solar tunnel drier produced superior quality&#13;
dry prawn under hygienic conditions.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PERFORMANCE OF VARIETY AND PLANTING MATERIALS ON THE YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING CHARACTERS OF SWEET POTATO</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2166" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rashied, M. H.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>AI- Mamun, M. N. H.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Islam, A. B. M. S.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rahmani, M. M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Jahangir, N. M.</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2166</id>
<updated>2019-01-15T06:16:57Z</updated>
<published>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">PERFORMANCE OF VARIETY AND PLANTING MATERIALS ON THE YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING CHARACTERS OF SWEET POTATO
Rashied, M. H.; AI- Mamun, M. N. H.; Islam, A. B. M. S.; Rahmani, M. M.; Jahangir, N. M.
he present experiment was conducted at the Horticulture Farm, Bangladesh Agricultural University,&#13;
Mymensingh during the period from December 2001 to May 2002 to study on the performance of variety&#13;
and planting materials on the yield of sweet potato. There were five sweet potato varieties viz.,Tripti,&#13;
Kamalasunduri, Daulatpuri, BARI sweet potato-a and BARI sweet potato-5 and three portions of vine&#13;
cutting used as planting materials, viz .. tip, middle and basal portion. TIle experiment was laid out in&#13;
RCBD with three replications. Growth habit, yield contributing characters and yield of sweet potato were&#13;
found to vary significantly from one variety to other. The highest yield of tuberous roots was found in the&#13;
variety Tripti (33.90 Ifha) and the lowest yield was obtained from the variety Daulatpuri (21.60 Ifha).Vine&#13;
parts used had significant influence on growth and yield of sweet potato. Planting of tip cuttings gave the&#13;
highest yield (31.58 t/ha). The yield of tuberous roots (26.85 t/ha) were recorded as the lowest from basal&#13;
cuttings. The combination of different varieties and planting materials exhibited significant variation in&#13;
some yield components and yield of sweet potato. The combination of Tripti with tip cuttings produced&#13;
the highest yield of tuberous roots (36.07 Ifha).
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>MERITS AND DEMERITS OF ECOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE AND MODE OF ITS ADOPTION IN BANGLADESH*</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2165" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ali, M. S.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Karim, A. S. M. Z.</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2165</id>
<updated>2019-01-15T06:12:11Z</updated>
<published>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">MERITS AND DEMERITS OF ECOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE AND MODE OF ITS ADOPTION IN BANGLADESH*
Ali, M. S.; Karim, A. S. M. Z.
he main purpose of stusdy was to discuss about the merits and demerits of ecological agriculture and to&#13;
determine its mode of adoption in Bangladesh. Attempt was made to search internet. available books. journals&#13;
and printed materials from different sources of home and abroad during the period from June 2004 to October&#13;
2008 and it was revealed that there was on going debate in favour of and against ecological agriculture as it&#13;
has many merits and demerits. For determining the mode of adoption of ecological agriculture in Bangladesh.&#13;
data were collected from a sample of 144 ecological farmers drawn from a population of 478 ecological&#13;
farmers of six Area Development Centers (ADCs) of Proshikha with the help of a pre-tested interview&#13;
schedule during the period from February to August. 2006. Findings revealed that more th:1I1half (52.12 per&#13;
rent) of the total lands of the respondent farmers were cultivated by the mixture of ecological and chemical&#13;
practices compared to 47.66% of the total land of the farmers were cultivated by absolute use of ecological&#13;
agricultural practices and only 0.22% of the total land of the fanners were cultivated by absolute chemical&#13;
inputs.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>IDENTIFICATION OF SELF-INCOMPATIBLE LINE FROM AVAILABLE GERMPLASMS OF Brassica napus</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2164" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mahmud, F.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rasuf, M. G.</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2164</id>
<updated>2019-01-15T06:08:34Z</updated>
<published>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">IDENTIFICATION OF SELF-INCOMPATIBLE LINE FROM AVAILABLE GERMPLASMS OF Brassica napus
Mahmud, F.; Rasuf, M. G.
Self-incompatibility mechanism in 22 local germplasm of Brassica napus genotypes was investigated&#13;
through seed set analysis and pollen tube growth behavior. Based on the seed set ratio. levels of self-&#13;
incompatibility varied from 0.0 to 93.33 percent. The entries Nap 205, Nap 248 and Nap 2037 showed low&#13;
level of self-compatibility. The genotypes Nap 0130, Nap 2013, Nap 9901. Nap 9904 and Nap 94006&#13;
showed intermediate level of self-incompatibility whereas the genotypes Nap 2001 and BARI Sarisha-l J&#13;
were almost self-incompatible. Based on the number of pollen tubes in the style, the genotypes Nap 108.&#13;
Nap 179. Nap 206, Nap 2012, Nap 2022, Nap 2057. Nap 2066, Nap 9905 and Nap 9908 were grouped as&#13;
self-compatible: Nap 0130. Nap 2013. Nap 9901, Nap 9904. Nap 94006, BAR I Sharisha-? and BARI&#13;
Sharisha-S as intermediate. Rest of the genotypes Nap 205. Nap 248, Nap 2001, Nap 2037 and BARI&#13;
Sharisha-l J were classed as self-incompatible. Both the methods provide more or less similar results. Five&#13;
genotypes. namely Nap 205. Nap 248. Nap 2001, Nap 2037 and BARI Sharisha-13 showed high level of&#13;
self-incompatibility along with success on bud pollination for producing Sllines.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
